After the sexual revolution

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

A little more light reading. The piece is by Christine Rosen writing at the Claremont Institute's online Review of Books "What (Most) Women Want", a book review of "Taking Sex Differences Seriously" by Steven E. Rhoads.

A web piece on a related topic, from The Edge, with streaming media, slides, or text, a nature-nurture debate about women in the sciences in University faculties. The debaters are Steven Pinker and and Elizabeth Spelke.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.sea-of-flowers.ca/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/376

1 Comment

The article by Rosen illustrates a problem I have with lots of feminists, and others who have a "one-view" look at the world. Other people can have an opinion that can be as right for them, based on what they believe in. This is why i have so much of a problem with the Christian fundmentalist types.
Hell, just the differences in the way men and women look at sex and are designed to function can create a huge rift in a relationship. People have died over drapes. I don't have any real information but I bet I am not making it up, the law of averages is just to great here. It's always been a wonder that so many people manage to stay married so long, they must operate at a much lower emotional level than I do.

Leave a comment

Archives

Widget-Links

Arts & Letters Daily
Blogcritics
Butterflies & Wheels
Sci-Tech Daily

LibraryThing

Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.12

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Tony Dalmyn published on May 11, 2005 11:00 AM.

For a laugh was the previous entry in this blog.

Novel Perspectives??? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.